I have a huge number of book reviews written for the past month or so of books, but I doubt anyone wants a giant book-review-spam, so I'm parcelling them out in related bits. This is two fantasy novels taken from unusual points of view.

Except the Queen By Jane Yolen
Two faerie sisters wind up banished to the modern world after seeing something they shouldn't have seen. Excellent urban fantasy that'll appeal to people who enjoy Charles de Lint. Unlike much urban fantasy, which is often told from the point of view of a younger (and hotter, love-interest-cup-overfloweth) woman, the characters through whose eyes we see in Except the Queen are older women. Although I'd commented on the age thing before, I'd not much thought about how much of a difference that would make, but it really does add a different perspective and depth to the story.

Goblinquest By Jim C. Hines
Basically this novel is dungeons and dragons told from the point of view of one of the cannon-fodder goblins, but Jim Hines' excellent sense of humour and the absurd make this an amazingly fun tale, and one I'd be happy to recommend to many of my roleplaying friends. Or, you know, any fantasy fans, but the d&d set will find it especially apt. (Unlike the cover of the book... having looked up it up for this post, now, I have to say that I don't think it fits the feel of the book very well!) If you haven't read Jim Hines' retellings of princess stories, you should read those too. They do a similar turn-the-tale-on-its-head thing from a much more feminist perspective.

Except the Queen By Jane Yolen
Two faerie sisters wind up banished to the modern world after seeing something they shouldn't have seen. Excellent urban fantasy that'll appeal to people who enjoy Charles de Lint. Unlike much urban fantasy, which is often told from the point of view of a younger (and hotter, love-interest-cup-overfloweth) woman, the characters through whose eyes we see in Except the Queen are older women. Although I'd commented on the age thing before, I'd not much thought about how much of a difference that would make, but it really does add a different perspective and depth to the story.

Goblinquest By Jim C. Hines
Basically this novel is dungeons and dragons told from the point of view of one of the cannon-fodder goblins, but Jim Hines' excellent sense of humour and the absurd make this an amazingly fun tale, and one I'd be happy to recommend to many of my roleplaying friends. Or, you know, any fantasy fans, but the d&d set will find it especially apt. (Unlike the cover of the book... having looked up it up for this post, now, I have to say that I don't think it fits the feel of the book very well!) If you haven't read Jim Hines' retellings of princess stories, you should read those too. They do a similar turn-the-tale-on-its-head thing from a much more feminist perspective.
no subject
Date: August 9th, 2011 06:07 am (UTC)So, I've made it to the third book, am waiting for a good opportunity to buy the fourth (on my new eBook reader...). Carriger hits almost every note right...except! Except! The transition between the second and third book, where I think she hit a very jarring note indeed and overplayed her hand. The character in question, well, I no longer like him or find him amusing. You get what I am saying? I am being obtuse to avoid public spoilage.
If in the third book Carriger had delivered a seriously equivalent comeuppance, then I might have been able to forgive him the way the book has forgiven him, but she didn't deliver on that one teeny weeny point. The third book is otherwise excellent but that one detail kind of pervades the air with a slight miasma of abusive asshattery rather than self-involved bumptiousness that had been originally quite entertaining. Actually, as I got to the end of the second book, I was suddenly immersed in what felt like literary cold water, and I haven't yet forgiven Carriger for it, let alone the character in question. I think it was a rather hamfisted way to get the plot twist in she needed to get, and there were probably other more delicate ways.
But who am I to criticize? Have I written a popular steampunk thriller? No, I have not.
no subject
Date: August 12th, 2011 11:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: August 15th, 2011 06:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: August 15th, 2011 04:38 pm (UTC)